Every day child molesters
violate children placed in their care.
We feel safe when criminal background checks are conducted on teachers, day
care providers, school bus drivers, Sunday school teachers and others. Still investigators, like myself, continue
to encounter great numbers of children violated by molesters who slipped
through these safeguard procedures.
Why? One reason is that known
and convicted predators represent only a small percentage of those predisposed
to molesting children.
Certainly background
checks are important. They do help
prevent known predators from having access to children. The problem is that most safeguard
procedures are limited to criminal history inquiry and/or information from “Megan Law” type registries.
Like the tip of an iceberg, known offenders, the kind background checks will
expose, do represent serious danger to the safety of children, but they are not
the greatest danger. Some identified
sexual predators have discovered ways to avoid being included in such
lists—others have never been identified as a threat.
The traditional checks remove the tip of that
iceberg. The resulting false sense of security keeps watchful
parents, concerned adults and prospective employers from looking deeper. These
become vulnerable to what lies beneath the calm surface.
Employers and child care
providers must recognize the limitations of typical background inquiries. They need to incorporate more thorough
methods of screening prospective employees.
Comprehensive background investigations
are often employed and do help but a more effective tool is
available. Forensic pre-employment
interviews will expose efficiently most potential threats. These threatening individuals are heavily
cloaked though a lifetime of effort.
Sexual predators seeking
employment are enabled by employers to harm the innocent when they are not detected and ejected. Forensic
interviews by persons experienced and
trained to recognize subtle deceptions or subtle indicators of deviance will
unmask the hidden danger.
Where are effective
screening personnel found by employers?
There is a vast, mostly untapped, resource available--retiring police
investigators and child protective investigators. These investigators may be looking for new exciting ways to use
their knowledge and experience while continuing to protect children. For some jobs, employers seek education and
youth in their new employees. In the
area of interpersonal relationships, however, particularly in discerning
potential hidden danger of a sexual nature, education cannot take the place of
experience. Ferreting out a potential
problem employee is not an exact science but rather an educated guess, even an
instinct drawn from years of experience.
Pre-employment interviews by experienced persons can remove potential
sexual abuse and harassment problems by eliminating from the prospective
employment pools those revealing potential risk.
Police officers and
investigators hone their people skills in the crucible of hard experience. They learn subtle clues indicating
deception; observation of human behavior is both taught and caught from
training and hundreds of interviews with both victims and suspects. After the background checks are done, the
interview process can weed out the dangerous predators seeking employment that
would give them access to children or other vulnerable individuals. Consider the benefit—weigh the cost of
human suffering, accompanying
litigation. Avoid the iceberg.